This is an amazing video about technology and change. And it fits right in line with the ethnography I’m doing on YouTube vloggers, which is coming along. I’m planning to post a version of the study once I complete it.
February 22, 2007
February 14, 2007
Belgian Court Rules Against Google
A Belgian court ruled that Google News violates copyright laws by linking to articles without owners’ consent.
A Brussels court has ruled in favour of a group of Belgian newspapers which argued that the site, which lists links to news stories from around the world, used material without their consent, and ordered that the articles be taken down.
The case, which was brought by Copiepresse, a group representing 17 French and German language newspapers, including La Libre Belgique and Le Soir, may set a precedent for other newspapers in Europe, lawyers said.
Google News at most displays the headlines, a few words, and a thumbnail photograph, so if user want to continue reading they must click the links that take them to original content owner’s site. My first assumption is that news providers would welcome the clickthroughs that result from Google’s aggregator, or at least accept that this is the nature of information on the web. This case is certainly a challenge to that line of thinking. Perhaps the Belgian news providers argue that in an age when people may be more likely to just glance at headlines (guilty as charged) Google hurts their business in the long run. Google archives over 4500 sources for its news service, so I can’t imagine this really affects their business all that much, but it could set a precedent for future litigation.
Read the full Article
February 8, 2007
Help Stop Public Broadcasting Budget Cuts
From this article at Common Cause:
February 7 -President Bush’s proposed federal budget includes a cut of approximately $145 million for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which serves as a source of information for millions of Americans who rely on its diverse viewpoints, hard-hitting investigative journalism and quality children’s programming.
The CPB helps to fund both NPR and PBS. Take action, use this free service set up by Free Press to easily email your congressional representatives to let them know you care about public broadcasting.
Just to contrast, the total proposed defense budget is $481.4 billion.
February 7, 2007
TiVo and the Future of Advertising
Last night I got home around 7:30 and caught up on some reading. Around 9:30 I could no longer ignore the rumblings of my midsection. Yes, I know you aren’t supposed to eat that late, but the rhythms of my work-school infused urbanite lifestyle have no time to wisely heed the advice of moms or dieticians. So, I’m hungry and it’s 9:30 and I know the Daily Show comes on at 10. I like to laugh at Jon Stewart laughing at politicians whilst eating reheated pizza, but I want to do so by my own schedule. So, I curse the hegemony of network television. Damn your false timelines Comedy Central!
I know I can’t fast-forward to the programming of my choosing, although I should be able to because it’s prerecorded, but the next best thing is probably services like TiVo and On Demand that let you record the shows you want to watch and then blissfully skip past the ads. Forgoing ads is the consumer’s dream come true. This technology has been out for a while now, and people still rave about it; it’s explicitly designed to enhance the viewing experience by conforming to our schedules and cutting out superfluous commercials. Super! Or course, I imagine that networks and ad agencies don’t particularly appreciate consumers fast-fowarding past billions of dollars, but who cares about what they want.
So, even though I have to wait the extra half hour to eat and catch the Daily Show, I come to the conclusion that TiVo and On Demand are great for consumers thank you very much.
Today I read this article from the San Francisco Chronicle, (tip from the excellent What’s New Media blog) discussing TiVo’s new data service called StopWatch. This service tracks which programs folks are watching and which ads they are skipping. TiVo execs promise (cross my heart, hope to die) that all data samples are randomized and thus made anonymous, but beyond the privacy issue lurks the question of what this data will be used for in the long run. Will TiVo sell it to Big Advertising?
The implications are that ad companies could (and will if they are “smart”) presumably use information such as this to evolve their business practices in troubling ways. This new information might lead to uber-refined market research into which ads are less likely to be skipped by certain viewers of certain shows, but just as probable, it could help prove what audiences have always known – we hate ads. We detest them and will always skip them if we can. The truth is that for every clever commercial that gets rave reviews at the water cooler, there are countless others that just waste our time. Yet they still play on and on and on.
What follows then is that the traditional ad model begins to break down (further than it already has) and the rampant culture of product placement gains new steam. I had a discussion with a friend the other day about The Office on NBC, which relentlessly plugs everything from shredders to iPods to Staples (yes, the entire store). I don’t really watch the show (I liked the British version with Ricky Gervais), but I think such blatant merchandising would be both awkward and irritating. Can we really stomach such new heights of sales-pitch entertainment? I’m afraid to answer.
TiVo, let us skip the ads on the down low. Just smile and tell Leo Burnett we are still watching, or risk compromising what little integrity content has left.
Guerrilla Marketing Mistaken for Terrorist Activity
On Jan. 31 the city of Boston stopped traffic on certain major highways and called in bomb squads and the FBI in response to what were perceived to be IEDs placed on or near bridges and other structural parts of highways. In reality the objects were blinking signs with a homemade look to them (think Batteries Not Included) depicting characters from Cartoon Network’s Aqua Teen Hunger Force. This is bizarre to say the least, but it gets even stranger. Apparently two individuals were arrested in connection with the guerrilla marketing campaign and Turner Broadcasting is going ro reimburse the city of Boston for the expenses incurred as a result of the incident, reportedly up to $1 mil.
On one hand, given the current political atmosphere, it’s probably not the best idea to place unknown electronic objects in conspicuous places on public property. However, these devices were really just lite-brites depicting meatballs with faces. Moreover, this campaign was carried out in 10 cities, none of which went to the extremes that Boston did…
Here’s a much better and more detailed description of events.
